Pacing, Defibrillators & Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy

Broadcast

Redefining Physiological Pacing

Jan De Pooter, Kartikeya Bhargava, Chi-Keong Ching, et al

Broadcast

Science of Pacing: The Next Chapter

Óscar Cano, Gaurav A Upadhyay, Matteo Bertini, et al

Watch time: 1h 3m

Broadcast

Cardiac Diagnostics in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Klaus Witte, Luca Santini, Alphons Vincent, et al

Watch time: 1h 2m 12s

Broadcast

Science of Pacing: The Next Chapter

Óscar Cano, Gaurav A Upadhyay, Matteo Bertini, et al

Watch time: 1h 3m

Julia Vogler,

Watch time: 1h 25m 50s (7 videos) (10 videos)

Broadcast

New Perspectives on the Science of Pacing

Zachary Whinnett, Aurélien Wauters, Daniel J. Friedman, et al

Watch time: 47m 49s

Broadcast

Redefining Physiological Pacing

Jan De Pooter, Kartikeya Bhargava, Chi-Keong Ching, et al

About

Cardiac pacing is a well-established therapeutic tool improving the survival and quality of life in patients. Indications for permanent cardiac pacing include sinus node dysfunction, intermittent and incomplete atrioventricular block, and bundle branch block.

Cardiac pacing, in conjunction with beta-blocker therapy, can potentially reduce the risk of bradycardia-dependent QT prolongation, decrease heart-rate irregularities and reduce repolarisation heterogeneity.

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing is an effective therapy in patients with advanced heart failure (HF) – New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV, an ejection fraction (EF) 120 ms.

CRT has also been shown to be effective for the prevention of HF in relatively asymptomatic patients with wide QRS. However, CRT is underutilised among eligible patients. Approximately one-third of patients do not respond to CRT due to various factors, including anatomic difficulties and suboptimal lead placement. To increase the effectiveness of CRT, it has been hypothesised that pacing at multiple left ventricular (LV) sites may provide more effective resynchronisation.

In clinical studies, use of MultiPoint pacing in HF patients undergoing CRT has been associated with increased haemodynamic and clinical benefits compared with conventional pacing, particularly in patients with the least improvement from biventricular pacing.

Articles

1-year Outcomes of PPI after TAVR: CONDUCT Registry: A PSM Comparison

Published:

24 June 2025

Citation:

Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review 2025;14:e14.

His Bundle Pacing in the Era of LBBAP

Published:

20 February 2025

Citation:

Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review 2025;14:e06.

Conduction System Pacing as an Alternative for CRT

Published:

18 February 2025

Citation:

Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review 2025;14:e04.

Atrioventricular Conduction Axis

Published:

08 November 2024

Citation:

Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review 2024;13:e20.